Roger Morris (REMO)
Roger Morris was born in 1954, Central Otago [Teviot] NZ . The family lived 7 years in the high country, then down to the Clutha flat for 4 years. His Mother and Father were farmers. In 1966 the family moved to Christchurch [high school] and Akaroa, to continue farming. After which he, at 17, against his parents every wish, in an outrageous act of rebellion and simplicity, went to Wellington in 1973, to train and work with NZ Police as cadet, then beat cop. (P4640) Before traveling overseas [OE] in 1975 to be free to experiment in other aspects of life than being a street target for the drunk and dispossessed. Returning to Auckland Elam Art school for one term in 1981.
After meeting his partner, the great NZ realist painter and screen-printer, Marianne Muggeridge, they built [our] [self-built] studio/home at the end of the Ōeo Road, south Taranaki NZ, where they [we] raised [our] their two beautiful and dynamic daughters Lucy and Myfanwy. Roger - me - is predominantly a painter in oils. Signing his [my] work ‘REMO’ since its easier to paint r e m o in signature than 'Roger Edward Morris' on the paintings. This art practice is followed closely, in terms of hours spent, by the carving of Taranaki Andesite stone, large and small. He -that is, I - have shown extensively in solo and group exhibitions since 1986.
Which is all very good and fine.
But. now to the now.
"Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.
Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.
Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” karl Rove.
"You are either with us. Or with the Terrorist " G W Bush
http://noliesradio.org/archives/106841 False Flag Islamophobia Conference: Live Stream from Paris on Dec. 12th Coming Up Saturday, December 12th…To Be Live Streamed from Paris, France. (this is a 4 Hour live Broadcast) 9:00 am – 1:00 pm Pacific * 12 Noon – 4:00 pm Eastern 6:00 pm – 10:00 pm Paris * 17:00 – 21:00 GM -
9/11 AS FALSE FLAG: WHY INTERNATIONAL LAW MUST DARE TO CARE
Amy Baker Benjamin*
At the heart of contemporary international law lies a paradox: The attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001 have justified nearly fifteen years of international war, yet the official international community, embodied principally in the United Nations, has failed to question or even scrutinize the U.S. Government’s account of those attacks. Despite the impressive and serious body of literature that has emerged to suggest that 9/11 was a classic (if unprecedentedly monstrous) false-flag attack, international statesmen, following the lead of scholars, have acted as if there is no controversy whatsoever. This disconnect between the growing (alternative) evidentiary record of state responsibility for the attacks and the focus of international institutions is impossible to sustain if those institutions are to maintain any semblance of viability and meaning.
Now. Argument has to be made in the face of this egregious world view, that 'we,' 'the people' - may be being 'tricked'
"When a monumental event occurs that transcends the power of the courts to uncover the truth, the US government turns to special commissions—most recently for the investigation into the 9/11 terror attacks." "After the 9/11 attacks, the nation was swept by a wave of war hysteria, and concern for basic civil liberties went right out the window." [5. Presidential Commissions & National Security By Kenneth Kitts, Lynne Rienner, 2006]
Where is 'power' and 'transcendence' defined, allowing material fact and legal contest of physical evidence to become 'unrecoverable?'
Where does the legal precedent establishing Criminal Law Courts of the United States of America and World Community acting through the UN, cede the Power and Right to Investigate evidence-of-high-Crime, properly found ?
If there is evidence to argue the crime, how can the crime transcend the law?
IN the structural realignment of thinking that has to take place to properly assemble evidence of 911 AS a complex false flag 'black' operation, certain research must be done. NATO operation GLADIO. Peter Dale SCOTT on "DeepState." David Ray GRIFFINspivotal work on WTC7 and the Commission Report Omissions and Distortions. COG [continuity of Government.] P2OG Pentagon provocations under Rumsfeld, NATO/UN R2P, and SCAD/StateCrimesAgainstDemocracy.
GLADIO is undisputed historical fact http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/GAN412A.html http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=16921 - was and is [GLADIO b] a post-World War II program set up by OSS/CIA and NATO in covert war against Russian communism in Western Europe and, one way or another, in the continental USA. National Security Council directive 10/2, on June 18, 1948, “gave the highest sanction of the [U.S.] government to a broad range of covert operations” — propaganda, sabotage, economic warfare, subversion of all kinds — that were seen as necessary to “win” the Cold War against the Communists. ] In fact, GLADIO became a (deep)state-sponsored right-wing terrorist network, involved in false flag terror operations and the subversion of democracy [SCAD:State Crimes Against Democracy] within western Europe. [Red brigades/Aldo Moro etc] spreading across the world, morphing into GLADIO b in the 2000's as reported by the great FBI whistleblower Sibel EDMONDS:
The existence of GLADIO [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniele_Ganser ] was admitted by the Italian government in 1990, after judge Felice Casson discovered the network while investigating right-wing terrorism. Italian prime minister Giulio Andreotti admitted GLADIO’s existence, while minimizing its significance. The main function of the GLADIO groups, in the absence of Soviet invasion, became the discrediting of any opposition to DeepState [Peter Dale SCOTT definition,] by use of “ strategy of tension” acts of extreme violence against innocent civilian population. ie: false-flag terrorism and public 'street-bombings' [read Boston.London 7/7. Madrid, Paris ad nauseam]. The 'strategy of tension' is the tactical deployment of 'random' [but VERY directed] violence for control and manipulation of public opinion. Use of fear, propaganda, agents provocateurs, and terrorism. The aim was and is to instill fear into the populace while framing political opponents for terrorist atrocities. [ie: 19 Islamic terrorists] and reworking legislation to the advantage of the deeper state interests . Surveillance etc.
'You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security." [sworn testimony by Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra.]
GLADIO is cited responsible for the Bologna Railway station bombing in 1980, an atrocity killing 85 people and wounding over 200. This single act of malevolence has to be understood at the center of the argument going forward; in rearranging our internal dialogue., in contesting the official narrative of all similar events. Most specifically, the 911 atrocity [OCT] Official Conspiracy Theory, JFK, RKF, Oklahoma, Boston etal. To understand that NATO/CIA allied with right-wing fascist networks, perpetrated an act of mass murder against the Italian people, designed to counter the Italian Communist party's political rise pre-election :- That western deepstate power interests decided an act of mass murder to serve real politik, swinging the election.... Which they did... to understand this degree of malevolence is imperative to understanding the world we live in today. Especially and specifically, the 911 deception . [JamesJesusAngleton, "Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the State"] The covert absolute of GLADIO - already PROVEN - is "to FRAME" an otherwise un-involved or unknowing group [the patsy/Oswald/SirhanSirhan/JamesEarleRAY/Tseniev brothers/Islam itself] as perpetrator of savage 'lone-nut' acts of violence against average citizenry [those who would NEVER consider it possible 'their own Government would kill their own people", thus generating the hate/rage/revenge reaction inculcated in the DNA of the population; designing it like a shaped charge TOWARD that targeted patsy group [PNAC/NEOCON/911 "absent a new Pearl Harbour".] EVERY act of 'homeland' terror we are undergoing today, HAS to be run through Bologna/GLADIO template/algorithm in-the-first-instance. The sinister depth and nature of the matter can only be appreciated by recognizing use of clandestine right-wing fascist elements to pursue goals through acts of extreme violence. As if Deepstate and fascism were ever separate. As we have just seen in UKRAINE with US ass sec state Victoria NULAND USAID coup detat allied with fascist Svoboda/pravySector.
To illustrate this deep and materiel collusion, where European Fascism rooted into the 5-eyes democracies, study of 'operation PAPERCLIP' is essential -the invitation for NAZI high-enders into western democracies post WWII] (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYvO3qAlyTg Zbigniew Brzezinski Trustee, Trilateral Commission; Director (1973-1976) Director, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (1972 to 1977) In 1979 Carters National Security Advisor] And how consciousness, or 'morality' of PAPERCLIP relates to GLADIO.
Incidentally, and in terms of the 911-demolition evidence being automatically pegged as a 'conspiracy theory.' The threshold of 'believability' of 'whether-or-not-it-is-possible' in popular thinking, is generally established by five or six 'conspiracy killings' in the 1960's. The largest of course, of the big three, being the murder of JFK. Next, the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King. Any contention J E RAY didn't murder MLK, was regarded as a conspiracy theory made by unsound minds. UNTIL the 1999 Jury trial in Memphis finding CIA/FBI/Military Intelligence/Memphis Police/Mafia GUILTY OF CONSPIRACY to murder MLK; until that case WAS PROVEN IN the courts of LAW; any discussion James Earle Ray was innocent, was met with scorn and derision. Yet, a court has found the conspiracy existed, and was proven, thus eliminating MLK from the list of other 'lone nut conspiracy theory' protections and projections surrounding the deepstate murder of the Kennedy's, Martin Luther, Malcom X etal. This transition of an historic 'conspiracy theory' to an historic'conspiracy fact'; from 'probable' to 'certain,' of course receives no media attention, because doing so would automatically trip the 'transformation from probability to certainty' the other 'conspiracy theories' are real. That is, bona fide conspiracy Fact. The same applies to recent exposures of the Gulf of Tonkin incident being a practical 'false flag' event. So that, we can see 'control of the narrative' continues even when the conspiracy is proven, media remain essentially SILENT. Or, there is no CONTEXT to the revelation supplied. Discussion relative to present geopolitics and recent terror events, does not occur. CIA murdered Martin Luther King. What does that mean for JFK? RFK? to Buzzy Krongard and the PUT options on 911?